165: Carlos Seixas

 Carlos Seixas was a central figure in early 18th-century Portuguese music and one of the most talented composers to emerge from the Iberian Baroque tradition. Born in Coimbra in 1704, he was the son of the cathedral organist, which gave him early exposure to sacred music and keyboard practice. After his father’s death, Seixas succeeded him as organist while still very young, demonstrating an unusual level of technical skill and musical maturity for his age. His early development in a cathedral environment shaped both his command of counterpoint and his sensitivity to liturgical musical forms.

In his early twenties, Seixas moved to Lisbon, which at the time was a thriving cultural center under the reign of John V of Portugal. The royal court was heavily invested in artistic patronage, particularly sacred music, and Seixas eventually became organist of the Royal Chapel. This position placed him at the heart of Portugal’s most important musical institutions and allowed him to interact with leading musicians of the time. Lisbon in this period was also influenced strongly by Italian musical fashions, which shaped the broader stylistic environment in which Seixas composed.

A particularly important figure in Lisbon’s musical life during Seixas’s career was Domenico Scarlatti, who served at the same court. The presence of Scarlatti had a profound impact on keyboard composition in Portugal, and many scholars draw comparisons between the two composers. While Scarlatti’s sonatas are often more formally experimental and harmonically adventurous, Seixas’s works tend to feel more improvisatory and structurally flexible, sometimes described as more “Portuguese” in their expressive freedom. It is likely that the two influenced each other, directly or indirectly, through the shared court environment.

Seixas is best known today for his keyboard sonatas, written primarily for harpsichord and organ. These works are notable for their variety: some are concise and dance-like, while others are expansive and unpredictable, shifting between contrasting moods and textures. He often avoided strict formal patterns, favoring a more spontaneous unfolding of musical ideas. This approach distinguishes him from many contemporaries who adhered more closely to established Baroque forms. His music also shows a strong sense of idiomatic writing for keyboard, suggesting he was himself a highly skilled performer.

Tragically, much of Seixas’s output was lost in the devastating Lisbon earthquake of 1755, which destroyed libraries, archives, and musical collections across the city. As a result, only a fraction of his compositions survive today, making it difficult to fully assess the scale of his work. What remains, however, is enough to establish his importance as one of Portugal’s greatest early composers. His surviving sonatas continue to be performed and studied, valued for their originality and emotional immediacy.

Today, Seixas is seen not only as a representative of Portuguese Baroque music but also as a bridge between national tradition and broader European stylistic currents. His music reflects a fascinating intersection of local Iberian sensibilities with the Italianate virtuosity that dominated 18th-century court culture. Despite his short life and the loss of much of his music, his surviving works ensure his lasting place in the history of keyboard composition.

Here are some of his works:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

54: Trills in the Baroque vs. Classical Periods

Image
Baroque music is known for its incredibly technical and ornamented style. The most common and fundamental of those ornaments is our focus today: the trill. Most simply, a trill is a very fast, repeated alternation of two notes. In the vast majority of cases, those notes are adjacent, but that is not a requirement. Given how fast and common they are, regardless of what you play—whether it’s a string, wind, or keyboard instrument, or your voice—they have a reputation for being quite tiring to play. The period matters when considering a trill. Classical and later composers treat trills, in a sense, in the opposite manner than Baroque composers do. Let me show you two examples: First, the Baroque way of thinking. This is a PAC:   and especially in the Baroque era, when the plucked harpsichord dominated over the hammered piano, it was hard to sustain sounds for long since the sound of the plucking decays quickly. The trill was developed in response, out of a need both to ornam...
Read more

35: Figured Bass

Image
  There’s a system of notating harmonies that’s rather unique to the Baroque era, but which is so frequently used there, and so important to it, that no discussion of theory would ever be complete if we did not cover it. This is the notation of figured bass: “figured,” in the sense of using figures (numbers) to notate the bass. Figured bass was, in a sense, its own notation completely separate from the five lines and four spaces of the staff, which was nearly exclusively the purview of cellists, bassists, harpsichords, and organists.  Figured bass, fair warning, can be intimidating at first. But, just as with anything else we’ve covered so far, the more you practice reading it, the better you’ll get.  In this system, we use numbers to indicate intervals above the bass. We stack them, and this is how we build chords. If you can’t stack them, nowadays, it’s perfectly fine to use slashes and write the numbers horizontally.  Let’s start with the easiest figured bass nota...
Read more

102: Wagner (who was terrible, in case you didn't know), Tristan, and French Sixths

Image
 Let’s turn our attention to one chord—yes, one literal chord, not one class: F-B-D#-A. The original context that made this “The Chord” that everyone talks about—the reason this opera is as famous as it is—is its inclusion in Richard Wagner’s “Tristan and Isolde.” The whole opera lasts just shy of four hours, but it’s most remembered for this one chord. Here it is, in red, from the Wikipedia article about the opera, during which a hugely significant amount of time is spent just talking about this single chord. It almost cannot be overstated how important this chord was to the development of music in the late 1800s and early 1900s.  Some have said—again, referring to quotes in the Wikipedia article—that the power of this one chord in the late 1800s was the same as the transformative power of Beethoven 3 or 9 in the first part of the 1800s; I don’t think that’s hyperbole in the slightest. Deplorable as his personal politics were (he was violently antisemitic and the favorite com...
Read more