39: Terraced dynamics
We should, at some point, discuss dynamics in Baroque music written for keyboards. This, ultimately, leads us to a discussion of how Baroque keyboards were built, and how those methods of construction differ from modern ones.
The harpsichord was, other than the organ (which almost all
existed in the town parish church), the keyboard instrument of choice of the
era, and it, together with the cello (and/or the double bass—so named because
it doubles the bassline provided by the harpsichord and/or
cello, an octave lower) was responsible for the lowest harmonic voice, often
simply rendered in figured bass notation as we discussed in a previous article.
There’s a key distinction between harpsichords and pianos that both led to the
later invention of the piano compared to the harpsichord, and to the eventual
replacement of the older instrument by the newer one as the de facto keyboard.
Harpsichords use little hooks to pluck at strings to produce sound, whereas pianos
use felt-tipped hammers to strike them. You can vary dynamics on a piano continuously
because the amount of force you apply to a key directly correlates to the
pressure with which the hammer strikes the strings—push a key harder to play louder,
and the hammer will fall with more force, creating the louder sound. (Do the
opposite—less force on the key means less force by the hammer—to play softer.)
Harpsichords, meanwhile, exist in a binary because of the plucking, rather than
striking mechanism; either you pluck, or you don’t. Harpsichords had levers
that controlled—in a binary sense—how this plucking took place. If the lever
was in a certain position, the plucker plucked both of the 2 strings tuned to the
requested pitch, creating a louder sound. If the lever was in another position,
the plucker was shifted in such a way that it only caught one of the two
strings. This is how you vary dynamics on a harpsichord—by changing the position
of the lever.
The piano now has something similar, in addition to the fact
that force determines loudness. One of the pedals below a piano also has this shifting
effect, whereby instead of striking both strings that correspond to a pitch
with the hammer (with more or less force, potentially amplifying this pedal’s
effect), you can shift the hammer over so that it only strikes one.
The fact that the piano has continuous variability in dynamics was one of the
main reasons the piano eventually obliterated the popularity of the
harpsichord. So how did harpsichordists create contrast in dynamics? Usually by
employing what we call “terraced” dynamics”. Rather than crescendoing or decrescendoing,
the harpsichordist would play something with the lever in the 2-string
position, then flip it to the 1-string position, or vice versa. Therefore,
there would be discrete jumps in the dynamics, say, of an original phrase and
its echo, rather than smooth changes. Because there are these distinct levels
of volume—like the distinct steps on a terrace, say, built for the cultivation
of rice on the side of a hill—we call this technique of switching immediately
between loud and soft or vice versa, especially in a Baroque context, “terraced
dynamics.” This technique was seen as particularly expressive in the keyboard tradition
of the day, and is one of the key reasons why keyboard music of the period can
be so dramatic.
Comments
Post a Comment