38: Sparse Markings and the Baroque Rules
If you pick up a score by Bach and another by Beethoven, you’ll
see completely different attitudes toward markings. Bach’s Allegro assai from
BWV 1005 (the last movement) has literally one marking: “Allegro assai.” The
only other information a violinist gets is a bunch of notes and a few bowings—no
“piano”, no “forte”, no “crescendo”. This was the common practice in the Baroque
era: you were simply expected to know some conventions, and if you did, your mind
would be aligned with the composers mind.
So here are a few of the rules:
1.
When a line rises, get louder, and when it falls,
get softer
2.
When a line is repeated exactly twice, the
second is an echo of the first and should be softer
3.
When a line is repeated 3 times or more to form
a sequence, the beginning of each of the sequence’s legs should be clear, and
you should do something to differentiate each leg
4.
When playing a polyphonic line involving
repeated excursions away from and returns to some pedal point, the line that
moves always takes precedence
Let me illustrate. Writing like this is all over BWV 1001-1006 (suites for
violin) and 1006-1012 (suites for cello):
Here, it’s clear that E-G-A-Bb-A-G-F is the more important line, than the Cs we
keep coming back to. This may be only one instrument (one violin), but it’s
clear there are 2 voices here—the stuff that moves, and the Cs. The moving
stuff is always more important.
5.
When a fragment is repeated identically around
things that change, deemphasize the repeated fragment, and make the moving line
interesting:
Here we are again, a few bars later:
F-D-A is clearly what’s important here, not those C-B-C groups that get tacked
on. Bring out F-D-A more than the C-B-C each one has attached to it
6.
When you modulate without doing so explicitly,
thereby introducing a bunch of non-chord tones, make them interesting, and
relate them back to where “home” still is, technically, and where “home” feels
like it is, thanks to the non-chord tones:
Here, that means “we spend a bunch of time in G melodic minor, and Bach makes
us think we’re ending up there, but then we end up in G major at the cadence, but
we never technically left C”—so make G minor and G major interesting, and do
something as you play to relate G major and minor to each other, and to C major.
7.
When you repeat a section in its entirety, the
two repetitions should be different, not carbon copies:
What follows the cadence from rule 6 is a return to the very beginning, and we play
everything over from the top, starting with:
The second time, highlight another line you didn’t the first time, or play it consistently
louder or softer (although echoes are, 99% of the time, softer), or change up a
bowing, or play something in a different string/position. Whatever you do, don’t
play the exact same thing twice
8.
When the piece is broken up into clear sections
with similar/identical material in different keys, connect them and explore the
relation, but play or sing the phrasing differently.
After the repeat of the material from rule 7, we continue on to the second half
of the sonata, and it starts like this—identical to the original beginning,
only down a fourth in G major (although still notated in C, now with an F#
everywhere). It is true that the two halves are very similar. Take the time to
explore the relationship between C and G, and make a point out of the existence
of the F in the first half, versus F# in the second. Don’t treat the C major
material and the G major material like they need to be almost identical in
their phrasings.
9.
Whenever you see a sharpened tonic, something is
changing—don’t ever let that go unexplored.
As the second half of the Allegro progresses, we eventually come to
Your mind should immediately see by now that something is changing—after all, what
could a C# in a piece that’s been all about exploring C major so far, be doing
here?? A sharpened tonic??
(It turns out that that C# is Bach’s way of gently shifting the ear’s center
from C to A which after all has a very crucial C#—via major, but ultimately
landing, from A major, into A minor for a while; then, the whole rest of the
piece is spent, after exploring A minor for a bit, trying to find a way out and
back to C major.
I know that, because where this came from is sometimes called the “Baroque violinist’s
Bible”, so we all know these sonatas really well, whether we’ve actually played
them or not. A first-time listener should only be expected to hear the C#,
recognize something is out of place, and know change is coming; knowing what the
change will be requires a lot more
listening time.)
10. Recenter
yourself—and show that happening—when the composer recenters the music.
We know from rule 9 that Bach, in the second half of the Allegro, sends us on a
journey, kicked off by that C#. You know that feeling where you’ve gone
somewhere, and you need the GPS to get back home, but a few miles from home,
when you’re back in familiar territory, you turn off the GPS, or send it
somewhere else, because you’ve gotten back to a familiar place from an unfamiliar
one, and how that changes your attitude as a driver? Do the same thing—tell the
audience “Ok we aren’t home yet, but we’re not lost/in an unfamiliar place
anymore, so I can see home on the horizon, and we’re almost there” when a
composer gives you a clear familiar harmonic milepost on your journey home.
For example, in the second half, we have this:
After many bars of meandering, we’ve finally found our way to… the bakery 3
blocks from home where we go get a croissant every morning. We’re not home yet,
but we’ve made it to a very familiar place that’ll lead us there in short order.
The “bakery” in this analogy, of course, is G major—just one stepping-stone away
from “home” in C major, since G is the dominant of C. We’ve come back to G, so the
meandering is over, and we have a straight shot to C
11. Highlight
extremes of register (very high or very low) and especially passages that move
between them.
As we approach the end of the Allegro, having already found our way back to G,
C is our next and last checkpoint. On the way there, you saw in rule 10 that
there was a hugely important ascending scale. It turns out that this is, at
least for violins (and probably for anyone else, except maybe flutes) the literal
highest note Bach ever wrote. Extremes like that—and, at the opposite end, 3
octaves away, the lowest note possible on the instrument, of which Bach makes
frequent use—and especially passages that travel between high and low extremes,
should get special attention. Look at how the previous passage continues,
traveling lower and lower after hitting that high G the first time:
12. As
in a well-written essay, the conclusion is the most important part; once you
know you’re getting close to the end, start giving indications to the audience.
Some of them may be in the music, some may be your own phrasing. Here, for
instance, to end the Allegro, Bach recalls how it started, and, using that
figure from the beginning, ties everything up with a bow and brings us back,
finally, home to C major with the final cadence:
It was the practice of the Baroque masters to assume you knew
all these rules—which apply just as much to sung music as to instrumental music—rather
than using markings to make the rules explicit for you. It was only later, in
the Classical and Romantic periods, especially as technology advanced and
composers could be more granular about what they wanted (especially regarding
tempo—specifying exact beats per minute, instead of a generic “play really fast
because I marked this Presto”), that more frequent, detailed markings appeared.
Knowing these rules is a key to musicianship, and understanding them even if
only as a listener, will be tremendously helpful to your experience engaging
with this wonderful music.
Comments
Post a Comment