15: Enharmonic Equivalence
“Enharmonic equivalence” may sound daunting, but it really isn’t that hard. It merely puts a name to the fact that there are two reasonable ways (and many more ways that are so convoluted they border on absurd) to name many notes.
For example, would you not agree that G and A are a whole step apart, so there’s
a note between them? And would you not agree that you can get there just as
easily by sharpening G as by flattening A? This, of course, is true. (Just as
one can sharpen F or flatten G to get to that note in the middle; or flatten D
or sharpen C; and so on.)
When there exists a pair of notes like this, separated by a whole step, the
note in between has two names: [upper note] flat and [lower note] sharp. These
two notes—F sharp and G flat, for example—are said to be “enharmonically
equivalent.”
Of course, one could say that, for example, E-triple-sharp and G natural are
equivalent (because, yes, E and G are that far apart)—but if you actually see
something asking you to play “E-triple-sharp,” then you’re either playing
something ultra-modern in which rules don’t matter anymore, or you’re playing
something written as gag to be deliberately funny or hard to play.
Double sharps or double flats can and do happen, but they are much rarer than their
single cousins. Let me show you an example of a situation, rare as it may be,
in which using a double-sharp (and not its much simpler enharmonic equivalent)
is absolutely necessary.
The key of G sharp major has 8 sharps (you’re much more likely to see it
written as the 4-flats A-flat major, but just go with this for a moment), and
we must use every letter name once, so we can start off with
G A B C D E F G
just as a baseline.
Then we need to spend 7 of our 8 sharps on our first pass, so we sharpen them
in order (F C G D A E B)—but we end up sharpening everything, and we end up
with
G# A# B# C# D# E# F# G#
but this is a problem, for two reasons: 1) we haven’t spent all our sharps, and
2) F# to G# is a whole step, and the last interval in a major scale is a whole
step—so we make another round of FCGDAEB, spending as many sharps as we still have,
converting sharps to double-sharps.
So the final correct spelling of G-sharp major is indeed
G# A# B# C# D# E# Fx G#
(Where here “x” means “double-sharp”).
We do have to use the “Fx” and not the more intuitive “G” because although the
note technically does sound as a G, recall that one of the rules of
scale-building is that every letter name must be used.
“Fx” and “G” are equivalent, so even though “Fx” is more awkward most of the
time, here, we must use it.
One last caveat about equivalence: Beware the pitfalls of
B/C and E/F. B-sharp is C, and C-flat is B; and E-sharp is F, and F-flat is E.
I’ve seen these two spots trip people up many times precisely because, unlike,
say, C to D which has C-sharp/D-flat in the half-step between them, there is no
gap-note between B and C, or between E and F.
Comments
Post a Comment